Real Estate

Housing.com β†—

Ready Score 42/100
Sushant Pasumarty
ANALYSIS SUPERVISED BY Sushant Pasumarty
πŸ“… 14 Feb 2026

Housing.com's property search data reveals income brackets, family stage, geographic preferences, and investment capacity β€” shared with dozens of broker partners. At 42/100, the platform's broadcast model to real estate agents creates DPDP consent issues similar to PolicyBazaar's insurance model.

⚠️ Compliance Gaps

  • No DPDP Act 2023 reference
  • Property search data reveals income bracket and life stage
  • Location preferences shared with multiple broker partners
  • No data retention timelines for property search history
  • Data Protection Board not referenced
  • Broker data sharing creates uncontrolled data dissemination
  • Financial pre-qualification data handling undefined

βœ… Strengths

  • Property listing categories documented
  • Security measures described
  • Grievance officer designated

Overview

Housing.com is a leading Indian proptech platform connecting property seekers with brokers and developers. When users search for properties, they reveal some of their most personal financial and life-stage information: budget range (income indicator), property size (family composition), location preferences (lifestyle and community), and whether they’re renting or buying (financial status).

DPDP Readiness: Section-by-Section Analysis

Property search consent covers broad data sharing. When a user clicks β€œContact Agent” or submits an inquiry:

  • Name and phone number go to the broker/developer
  • Search history (budget, location, property type) may be accessible
  • Financial pre-qualification data (if submitted) goes to loan partners

DPDP concern: A single property inquiry sends your phone number and life-stage data to individual brokers who will call repeatedly. No granular consent.

Section 9 β€” Data Retention πŸ”΄

No retention for:

  • Property search patterns (2BHK in South Mumbai = specific income/lifestyle inference)
  • Broker inquiry data (how many brokers have your number now?)
  • Financial pre-qualification submissions
  • Wishlist and saved properties

Section 11 β€” Rights of Data Principal πŸ”΄

  • Can users force brokers to delete their contact information?
  • No mechanism to retract data from multiple agents who received it
  • No data portability
  • No nomination rights

Risk Assessment

CategoryRisk LevelPotential Impact
Broker data disseminationCriticalPhone numbers distributed to uncontrolled agents
Financial inferenceHighBudget searches reveal income
Life stage inferenceHighProperty type reveals family status
Data retentionHighSearch history indefinitely stored

Recommendations

  1. Implement broker data agreements β€” Require agents to delete data if user requests
  2. Mask phone numbers β€” Route communications through platform instead of sharing direct numbers
  3. Add search data retention limits β€” β€œProperty searches: 6 months; broker inquiries: 90 days after last interaction”
  4. Build inquiry transparency β€” Show users which brokers received their data

How Does Your Policy Compare?

πŸ” Run Your Free DPDP Audit β†’


Analysis conducted by DPDP Consulting, a Meridian Bridge Strategy initiative. For a comprehensive compliance roadmap, book a free consultation.

Fix these compliance gaps today.

Book 1:1 Consultation
πŸ“ž Free Consultation